Nobody can deny that climate change is real and scientist do agree that the planet’s climate and weather is not fixed, but ever changing. It’s not disputed that levels of carbon dioxide are at higher levels than have been measured in the very recent past. However, those bare facts are where the broad scale agreement amongst climate scientists ends. Here’s the million dollar question – is there is a man made climate emergency for which the only solution is to drastically reduce global human CO2 emissions, otherwise we will cause global warming and destroy the planet?

Breaking News:

The British Royal Society has published the results of the analysis, that the temperature on Earth began to rise before the increase in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, and this is the very reason for the increase in CO2, and not the other way around (as climate models are incorrectly built to specify). “All evidence from the analysis suggests a one-way, potentially causal relationship with temperature as a cause and CO2 as an effect” Scientists firmly claim that climate change can’t be attributed to the human factor alone. Moreover, such a suggestion doesn’t explain 4.5 billion years of climate change. The authors note that the natural changes in CO2 caused by the rise in temperature are three times greater than the 4% produced by humans. (pay for report here https://royalsocietypublishing.org/…/10…/rspa.2021.0836)

Contents on this page

• Introduction,
• CO2 facts and figures
• Ice Core Data on Co2 and Temperature Rise
• Polar Bears are Thriving
• Robert Holmes Interview: Bringing Empirical Science to the Climate Debate
• 1,500 scientists sign World Climate Declaration
• Geo-engineering and climate modification
• Destroying Scotland in the name of “Climate Emergency”?
• Short Clip from Patrck Moore, founder of Greenpeace
• Volcanoes?
• Opinion Piece on Climate Crisis Anomalies
• Documentary: The Great Global Warming Scandal
• 50 Climate Prediction FAILURES!
• List of Alternative Climate Theory Experts

As citizens going about our day to day lives is it even possible for us to make any appreciable impact to this CO2? (See facts and figures below). It is being suggested we will need to implement the harshest and most draconian restrictions to our whole way of life. We will have to curtail our ability to travel, to farm, to power and heat our homes. We are being told we have to ditch our reliable, affordable and relatively efficient heating systems for technologies which have many issues, cannot match the same performance, and we already know that 10 times as many people die of cold than heat. We are even being told that somehow we need to drastically reduce the number of people on the planet. The implications are so wide and deep that we better be absolutely sure about the actions we take now.

Earth’s weather and climate is an extremely complex area to understand, and well beyond the experience of most people and even most scientists. This means we have to have very robust and open examination of the issues and possible solutions. We can’t afford to tolerate obfuscated science, political agendas, corporate elites and the like using fear to manipulate us and railroading us into a miserable and disastrous future.

On our current course, we are being herded towards, not a “green” future, but a technologically controlled one. These global policies seem more than willing to sacrifice nature and the environment in the name of “climate emergency”. The military industrial complex has been using technology for the purposes of climate manipulation accross our planet for decades now, but we are not allowed to know much about this. Far from being climate denialists, there are many scientists who have other theories about climate change which strongly suggest CO2 is not the major factor in climate change or global warming. Indeed there are other courses of action which need to be urgently undertaken, but seem to being ignored. Why are many credible scientists and experts who question this narrative being censored, silenced and attacked with adhominem. This should make us want to question the agenda.

We need to push for serious consideration of the issues using real open science, debate and transparency and honesty in policy making.

Some Facts and Figures

Carbon Dioxide is called the “gas of life” as it is required for plant life (ie all life) to survive on Earth. As a trace gas it makes up only 0.04% of gasses in Earth’s atmosphere. CO2 levels in Earth’s atmosphere have been significantly higher in the past and have been steadily declining for millennia, up until this trend was reversed in the 19th Century. If the CO2 levels drop too low, below 0.02% , then plant life cannot survive.

68% of atmospheric CO2 is generated by nature and 32% man made. Since the UK total contribution is only 1% this means as a country we contribute a total of only 0.32% of the atmospheric CO2. Using the IPCC’s figures this equates to roughly a potential 1/200th of a degree warming over this century.

Who are the biggest human CO2 emitters?

There are 6 countries responsible for 60% of human CO2 emissions.

• China (29.2%),
• USA (14%),
• India (7.1%),
• Russia (4.7%),
• Japan (3.5%),
• Germany (2.2%)

This information from Climate Action Tracker as of 06 June 2023.

“China’s emissions under current policies remain sky high with no sign of substantial emission reductions before the 2030…. Energy and electricity demand forecasts continue to grow, prolonging China’s dependence on fossil fuels, despite substantial progress in renewables and end use sectors… The government continues to champion the role of fossil fuels in transitioning its energy sector, with maximising coal production and oil and gas exploration seen as key to providing stability and security. The CAT’s overall rating for China’s policies and targets remains “Highly insufficient”.

Published field study observations prove polar bears are thriving

Posted on February 23, 2023 | Comments Offon Published field study observations – not population size – prove polar bears are thriving

There is irrefutable evidence from Barents and Chukchi Sea subpopulations, among others, that polar bears are fat and reproducing well despite marked declines in summer sea ice over the last two decades. These indicators of physical and reproductive health, in any species, are signs of thriving populations. However, these facts negate the premise that polar bears require abundant summer sea ice to flourish, and that creates a problem for polar bear specialists who continue to make that claim (Amstrup et al. 2007; Crockford 2017, 2019).

June 2023: Physics Novel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser, talks about the importance of conducting ‘good’ science to uncover real truths. He highlighted the rise and pitfalls of scientific corruption and criticized the climate emergency narrative calling it “a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.” See the Video (13min) here

Bringing Real Empirical Science into the Climate Debate

The following Robert Ian Homes video is just one example of scientific analysis which is not being given any consideration, essentially being censored by mainstream group think.

by; Robert Ian Holmes PhD. Available on Bitchute and Rumble

“In this video I mainly delve into something which is ignored by the IPCC and the climate science community – CLIMATE CYCLES.

VIDEO CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction | 02:32 Presentation starts | 03:22 16 cycles | 05:53 Ignoring the past |
09:05 Cosmic rays | 13:18 Warmer oceans release CO2 | 17:03 Plants love CO2 |
19:35 CO2 as high or higher 1500 years ago? | 20:43 Discrepancies between ice core and stomata CO2 data | 22:28 Global temperature vs cloud cover | 25:36 You can get warming from the sun when there’s less solar activity | 26:12 Cosmic rays and clouds | 29:58 65 million years of climate change |
31:47 Last 3M years: Very, very cold | 33:10 Downwelling long wave radiation from the Sun |
35:57 Net economic benefit up to 3C warming? | 37:57 Global warming on Neptune and Pluto |
42:20 Current high solar activity | 45:45 Who really worked on critical IPCC attribution  |
49:14 Hockey stick | 51:47 Cooling the past | 54:52 Central England record | 56:17 Climate sensitivity

CLIMATE CYCLES DOMINATE ALL CLIMATE CHANGES
One cannot understand climate change or global warming properly, unless one knows about climate cycles. They have always dominated climate changes on Earth, and still do today. The four key climate cycles which are most relevant to the current period of global warming (which started in 1690) are the Yoshimura, De-Vries, Bond and the Bray. 

WHY CURRENT CLIMATE MODELS ARE WORTHLESS
None of the above four climate cycles are in any IPCC report, or in any climate models; also missing from the climate models are accurate representations of clouds and convection. These problems, and the fact that climate models incorporate an incorrect null hypothesis of climate which includes a ‘Greenhouse Gas Effect’, mean that the models – and their results – are completely worthless. Yet the ‘scenario projections’ from these worthless models are what all Western governments are now relying on to form our energy and other policies.

Slides for this presentation: https://tomn.substack.com/api/v1/file/04c7463b-1434-4252-bda7-f94697a19f56.pdf
https://twitter.com/1000Frolly
https://www.youtube.com/user/1000frolly

World Climate Declaration by over 1500 scientists

World Climate Declaration

click HERE to read the Declaration signed by over 1,500 scientists

Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in.  This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

Bizarre “fact check” of World Climate Declaration

Click HERE to see this article

Geo-engineering causing disastrous climate change?

Man made climate engineering experiments, programes and military implementations have been going on since the 1940’s. They have been very actively concealed from the public awareness. Those white trails accross the sky are just aircraft “vapour” trails right? To consider otherwise seems inconceivable. But could the shocking truth be that Geo Engineering has now become so prolific and out of control that our planet is heading towards catastrophe? If so what can we do to halt it?

These important issues are examined in the Documentary “The Dimming”

Below is a presentation to the United Nations in 2006 about the release of chemicals into the atmosphere to cause weather and climate modification. It is not easy to find information about this, but looking up into our skies, the evidence of widespread man made unnatural cloud formations from jet trails is undeniable.

Destroying Scotland in the name of “Climate Emergency”?

The 2019 Climate Change (Emissions Reductions Targets) (Scotland) Act sets targets to reduce Scotland’s emissions of all greenhouse gases to net zero by 2045 at the latest, with interim targets for reductions of at least 56 per cent by 2020, 75 per cent by 2030 and 90 per cent by 2040. What will this mean in practice for life in Scotland?

In her opinion piece, Why do politicians listen to the fanatical Greens? Edinburgh resident Ariane Loening asks why Scottish ministers and MSPs are so beholden to Friends of the Earth Scotland and the Greens, that they accept the corruption of science and policies which will ruin and impoverish Scotland. She raises questions which need to be answered, along with referenced facts.

Patrick Moore, a founder of GreenPeace, speaks out against the corruption of Science in the climate debate.

Neil Oliver Opinion Piece Covering facts on Climate Change Crisis “Anomalies” including biases, errors, censorship, fearmongering and hypocrisy.

Fifty Climate Crisis Predictions That Failed to Materialise. and The Extinction Clock are 2 reviews of failed predictions of climate catastrophies from the past six decades. It becomes clear that these terrifying forecasts have not come to fruition but instead, they have been proven to be wildly inaccurate or outright false. 

List of Alternative Climate Theory Experts